Income Defects Are Rising. What is Your Defensive Strategy?

Executive Overview

Recent QC data should not be dismissed as cyclical noise. Overall critical defect rates have increased 18.5%, while Income and Employment defects have increased 47.6%.

As Nick Volpe, Executive Vice President of ACES Quality Management, stated:

“The increase was driven primarily by concentrated deterioration in income- and compliance-related findings, reinforcing the importance of documentation integrity and disciplined validation as refinance activity expands and lenders continue to operate lean.” ( Full report here )

This is not a volume problem. It is a documentation integrity problem.

For NonQM lenders operating in the self-employed segment, income validation now sits at the center of capital, compliance, and reputational risk.

Executive Risk Perspective – C-Suite Considerations

Income-related findings are not operational inconveniences. They translate into measurable downstream exposure:

• Repurchase risk
• Adverse action challenges
• Regulatory scrutiny
• Investor confidence impact
• E&O exposure

When Income/Employment findings increase nearly 50%, the signal is clear.

The relevant question for executive leadership is not whether QC teams can detect defects. The question is whether the organization has implemented disciplined validation controls before files clear underwriting.

Are you relying on borrower-provided documentation and third-party preparers alone? Or do you have a structured validation layer that reinforces documentation integrity at the front end?

Wholesale and Production Risk Perspective

In the NonQM channel, bank statement and P&L deals rarely collapse because of revenue. They collapse because documentation lacks structure, consistency, and defensibility.

Common breakdown points include:

• Inconsistent income presentation
• Unsupported expense ratios
• Unverified business ownership
• Poorly structured P&Ls
• Misalignment between tax documentation and underwriting analysis

When these weaknesses surface post-clear-to-close, or worse, post-funding, the impact extends beyond a single loan.

They affect:

• Lender/broker loyalty and relationships
• Pull-through ratios on submitted files
• Production credibility and reliability

As NonQM production activity expands while operational teams remain lean, tolerance for documentation error narrows significantly.

The First Line of Defense – Triple Validation

USTaxCerts was built to operate upstream of defect exposure.

Our triple validation framework for self-employed and business verification includes:

1. Business legitimacy and operating status confirmation

2. Self-Employment, ownership, and structural verification

3. Revenue and expense cross-validation aligned with underwriting standards

The distinction is critical.

Tax preparation focuses on IRS compliance.
Disciplined validation focuses on NonQM compliance and defensibility.

In a defect environment driven by income and compliance deterioration, structured validation becomes protective infrastructure.

Attestation Coverage and Liability Mitigation

USTaxCerts provides $2MM per-file attestation coverage.

This materially reduces downstream adverse-action exposure and liability tail risk.

When income documentation is later reviewed or challenged by:

• QC departments
• Investors
• Regulatory bodies
• Secondary market participants
• Borrower disputes

Documented third-party attestation demonstrates:

• Independent review by IRS Licensed CTEC #A363081
• Structured validation methodology and systems
• Reasonable reliance on vendors per Dodd-Frank
• Process discipline and accountability of vendors per Dodd-Frank

For executive leadership, this reduces exposure volatility.
For production leadership, it protects pipeline stability and long-term lender relationships.

Strategic Questions for Leadership

If income and employment defects are driving industry increases:

• What is your documented strategy to address them?
• Are you detecting issues in QC, or preventing them pre-underwriting?
• Does your NonQM channel have a defined validation perimeter?
• Is your organization relying on assumption or structured confirmation?

NonQM lending requires elevated documentation discipline.

Structured validation is no longer optional. It is defensive infrastructure.

Conclusion

Income-related defect acceleration is not an anomaly. It is a structural warning tied directly to documentation integrity and disciplined validation.

USTaxCerts serves as the first line of defense against NonQM documentation breakdowns and income-related defect exposure. Every file processed with USTaxCerts as the verification vendor is covered by the $2MM per-file attestation coverage.

In an environment where income findings issues are rising, and lenders operate lean, strengthening documentation controls before underwriting approval is no longer a tactical choice. It is a strategic requirement.

Recommendation: Review your current self-employed validation framework. Identify gaps in documentation structure and ownership confirmation. Consider implementing structured third-party validation with attestation backing to materially reduce downstream adverse-action risk and liability exposure.

Validation, attestation, and verification methodologies referenced herein are based on industry data analysis, structured documentation review practices, and risk mitigation controls aligned with underwriting expectations. Results represent a disciplined validation determination model and do not constitute legal advice.

Danny C. Flucke
Founder | NonQMVerifi®
Powered by USTaxCerts®

Self-Employment & Business Verifications For NonQM Lending
$2M Per-File Attestation Coverage

IRS Registered, Bonded, and Insured Tax Professionals
CTEC #A363081 | PTIN #P032873366
AFSP Certified | ITIN Certified

www.NonQMVerifi.com | www.USTaxCerts.com

Scenario Desk: Expense Ratios | Verification Letters | P&L's
Scenario@USTaxCerts.com

Office: 877.251.5522
Direct: 714.624.9479

Texas Based | Veteran Owned & Operated | Serving All 50 States